The list below is basically our set-up for our site.  All but the virtual 
machines.  Our uptime is basically 100%.  Not cheap.
 
 
Mark
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 June 2008 16:14
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Web Server Spec Question...



Nice list!  Well a lot of this isn't going to happen and I think the 99.999% 
was just thrown out there from a non tech guy.  Basically he was saying do what 
you can with the given budget to make this thing stay up to as close to 100% as 
we can with our resources and money...

 


  _____  


From: Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 9:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Web Server Spec Question...

 

Since 99.999% amounts to only 5 minutes of downtime a year, here is what you 
will need:

 

(1)    At least two ISPs with each one able to handle all your traffic in case 
the other goes down.

(2)    A router for each ISP running BGP between the them.

(3)    Two front end switches right behind the routers.

(4)    Two firewalls

(5)    Two Load balancers.  I highly recommend hardware load balancers.

(6)    Two switches behind the load balancers

(7)    The number of server needed to handle your traffic, times 2. Could 
probably VM some of the web servers.

(8)    If database driven, like SQL, Two SQL servers in a active/passive 
cluster.

(9)    For web server specs... instead of two big fat servers, go for more 
smaller servers. No need for redundant power suppliers, hard drives, etc.  If 
one web server crashes, the other web servers in the farm will handle the 
traffic.  If you web servers are going to store and server tons of files, like 
videos, then I would go with a RAID0 set up for better performance.  One HD for 
the O/S with no RAID.  Three HDs for the data in a RAID0

(10) If database driven (SQL server), spec out what you need  that will allow 
the website to run on one database server.  Triple that.  Then get a second one 
of the exact same spec.  At least RAID1 the O/S and RAID5 the SQL data.

(11) UPS.  Forget those small UPSs and go for one large one that can handle the 
entire load.  Then, get a second one.

(12) Generator.  UPSs do not run forever...

 

Then if you really want 99.999% uptime, take everything above and double it.  
But it in another location on the opposite side of the country (Ok, I admit we 
do not to this, but we do 1 to 12).

 

For course, this does not take into account developers changing coding on a 
Friday afternoon and not testing their code...

 

From: Chyka, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 5:42 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Web Server Spec Question...

 

We currently have our web site hosted off site on a partner's network.  We are 
now brining it to our site for hosting.  We have to buy a web server etc.  it 
is going to run under IIS and needs 99.999% uptime.  Would you cluster the 
server, just rely on redundant power, raid on the hds etc, or ???.

 

Alos is it best to have the content be on a Raid 1 disk set?  Just looking for 
some opinions etc.

 

 

Thanks..Bob

 

 

 

 










______________________________________________________________________


This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.


For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 


______________________________________________________________________









****** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com Limited ****** 
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.  Registration no. 
310635.
Inspop.com Limited (also trading as "Confused.com") is registered in England 
and Wales at 2nd Floor, Friary House, Greyfriars Road, Cardiff, CF10 3AE (Reg. 
No. 03857130 ).  Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the 
individual and not necessarily the  company. This email and any files 
transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies  (which may contain 
alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential  and 
solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected 
by  attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the 
person responsible for  delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that 
you have received this email in error  and that any use is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this email in error please notify the Information Security 
Officer by  telephone on +44 (0) 29 2043 4200. Please then delete this email 
and destroy any copies of it.   This email has been swept for viruses before 
leaving our system.
Security Warning: Please note that this email has been created in the knowledge 
that Internet  email is not a 100% secure communications medium.  We advise 
that you understand and accept  this lack of security when emailing us.
Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and any 
attachments are free  from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good 
computing practice the recipient should  ensure they are actually virus free.
We may monitor the content of E-mails sent and received via our network for 
viruses or  unauthorised use and for other lawful business purposes.
 


________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Messagelabs. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to