I think for the money there is nothing out there, that works as well. We have had no problems with ours except when early alpha testing a new feature which i dont think is out of NDA yet.
No speed issues, the reporting gives us all the information we need. It blocks what we want blocked, and allows what we want allowed. YMMV Graeme On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Andrew Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Personally I'd advise against it. I've found the reporting to be far from > comprehensive and the filtering categories are a little lacking in their own > comprehensiveness. I've also experienced a great deal of network slowness > with this product on the network and have to reboot it at least once a day. > > > > I love their spam firewall and think it's great, but I don't think I'd > recommend the Web Filter. I do have high hopes for their new 4.0 firmware, > but I fear I'll be disappointed. As always, YMMV. > > > > Andrew Greene > > IS Technician / Webmaster > > City of Anderson > > > > *From:* mqcarp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 21, 2008 11:16 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Barracuda Web filter > > > > Anyone use their web filter? We use SurfControl and I have had enough with > it. It is expensive annually and Websense is even higher. We love the > Barracuda SPAM filter, which is perfect for our business size. Is the web > filter a solid product too? > > > > > > > > > > > -- Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
