I have to agree Michael, I have started redirecting shared calendar requests in Outlook to SharePoint when appropriate. So far, people have really liked SharePoint.
On 10/1/08, Michael B. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In my most humble of opinions, if you need more than a couple of > calendars open at a time, then you need to be doing something else. > > > > Outlook is not a calendar aggregator. SharePoint does a really good job of > that. > > > > If someone believes that they have the need for lots of open calendars – I > point them at OWA and one calendar per tab in IE/FF. Much more positive > end-user experience. > > > > Regards, > > > > Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP > > My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael > > Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange > > > > *From:* David Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 01, 2008 10:59 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: OT: shared calendars > > > > My experience is you're limited by how robust (not just fast) the > connection is between the client PC and the Exchange server is. I've seen > PC's pretty much "give up" at about 15 calendars or so, and out of curiosity > (with O2K7 and E2K7) I just opened 20 calendars and while it works, it kinda > wiped out Outlook functionality … > > *David Lum** **// *SYSTEMS ENGINEER > NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION > (Desk) 971.222.1025 *// *(Cell) 503.267.9764 > > *From:* Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 01, 2008 6:57 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: OT: shared calendars > > > > If you read this: > > > http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.outlook.calendaring/browse_thread/thread/a7f4c13e6aec9333/7496868b74e55a4a?lnk=st&q=Outlook+2007+Maximum+shared+calendars#7496868b74e55a4a > > > > It seems to indicate the maximum is what you can fit on your screen. J > > > > > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 01, 2008 6:51 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Cc:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Subject:* RE: OT: shared calendars > > > > Here's the issue, our receptionist opens up shared calendars that staff > allowed and apparently she is stating there is a limitation of the amount of > calendars she can have within her client. I have yet to really investigate, > since I (like most of you) where all the hats of a one person IT Dept. > > > > I just wanted to inquire before I start a thorough investigation on the > client end. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Thomas > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 01, 2008 8:40 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: OT: shared calendars > > > > > > > > This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for > the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not > read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed > in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Girl > Scouts of Southwest Texas. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to > make sure no viruses are present in this email, Girl Scouts of Southwest > Texas cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from > the use of this email or attachments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Sherry Abercrombie "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
