Sherry, I'm shot to the heart and you're to blame. You give love a bad name.
Shook From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Oh, I "got it" Dave, I'm just taking a shot at Shook. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:50 AM, David Lum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: I think you missed it Sherry, there's even a shirt for Shook: http://www.zazzle.com/schizophrenic_shirt-235083872260949235 "OK" to Shook is not the same as it is to the rest of him. Dave From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical Just one question.....please define "OK"? ;) On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Andy Shook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: Yeah I used to be schizophrenic but we're OK now. Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:06 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Refers to self in third person..."adds emphasis" to others... hmmmm... -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical No, that would be Shookie didn't release the shift key before typing 1. Thanks for pointing that out...jerk! (THAT's added emphasis :) ) Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 7:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical Is that "added emphasis"? -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Server naming - virtual vs physical +! A server...is a server... is a server Shook From: John Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 11:28 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server naming - virtual vs physical No difference, as a matter of fact most of our VMs are P2Vd old physical servers where the hardware was on it's way. John W. Cook Systems Administrator Partnership For Strong Families ________________________________ From: David Lum To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Mon Oct 13 11:20:07 2008 Subject: Server naming - virtual vs physical Those of you with a good mix of virtual servers in your environment - do you differentiate the virtual servers from the physical ones on the server name? If so, how? If not, why not? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are prohibited. This information may be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. -- Sherry Abercrombie "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Arthur C. Clarke -- Sherry Abercrombie "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Arthur C. Clarke ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
