I was poking around the support site and ran across a bulletin instructing
you to disconnect the host to make a change to a configuration file on it.
Checking VC help, it said:

*Disconnecting a managed host does not remove it from the VirtualCenter
inventory. It temporarily suspends all VirtualCenter monitoring activities.
The managed host and its associated virtual machines remain in the
VirtualCenter inventory.*

So disconnecting the host from VC will suppress the alerts from being sent.


Jeff

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Greg Mulholland <g...@krystaltek.com> wrote:
> i'd encourage you then to log it with vmware. this seems like something
they should fix as it will continue to drive people crazy.
>
> Greg
> ________________________________________
> From: Jeff Bunting [bunting.j...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 10 January 2009 7:00 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: VMWare alarm question
>
> I just tried on another host which has never been in production and
> still got an alert email when I restarted it in maintenance mode.
>
> Just found this post:
> http://communities.vmware.com/thread/119038
>
> so guess this feature doesn't work (we have v2.5 running)
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Martin Blackstone <mblackst...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> What if you put the host into Maintenance Mode? That should stop the
alarm.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jeff Bunting [mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 9:09 AM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: VMWare alarm question
>>
>> Hoping one of you VMWare gurus can answer this....
>>
>> I'm updating the firmware on some of our ESX servers.  In virtual
>> center, there is an alarm defined at the datacenter level to email an
>> alert when a host loses connection to VC.  Is there a way to disable
>> this alarm when performing maintenance on an individual server?  The
>> host indicates the alarm is read only except at the top level, and I
>> obviously don't want to disable all of the alarms.  Creating an alarm
>> for each host just to be able to this isn't a very good solution
>> either.  Is there a better way?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jeff
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to