Actually, your shade example is a good one. Your closed shades would
stop the random, wanna be burglar from taking a chance on breaking
into your house, and finding nothing. They can't see that you have
"stuff" through your windows. They just want quick cash, so they walk
next door and see your neighbors wallet with cash sticking out on his
table through the window. They break in his house, and take the easy,
visible cash.
On Feb 20, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
My final rebuttal is this: There is no value in an aspect of security
or security process that can not be quantified. To do so is therefor
meaningless, and therefore has no value - other than some human oddity
that makes you personally feel good about doing it.
Im going to go pull the shades down on all my windows and pretend
there are no bad guys outside. :-)
--
ME2
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Jonathan Link <jonathan.l...@gmail.com
> wrote:
I will stipulate that security only by obscurity is false
security. But
likely to remain unconvinced that there is no role or value for
obscurity in
the security process.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
Eric Brouwer
IT Manager
www.forestpost.com
er...@forestpost.com
248.855.4333
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
