No, you're correct. 

 

Ben M. Schorr
Chief Executive Officer
______________________________________________
Roland Schorr & Tower
www.rolandschorr.com <http://www.rolandschorr.com/> 
b...@rolandschorr.com <mailto:b...@rolandschorr.com> 

Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bschorr

 

From: Jeff Bunting [mailto:bunting.j...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 8:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DHCP 80-20 rule

 

At half lease time, the client should request an address renewal. The
renewal request would be sent to the DHCP server that provided the
original lease, it is not broadcast to DHCPServer2.

IIRC, it will not broadcast again until the lease actually expires.
(someone will jump in to correct me if I'm wrong)

Jeff

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Jim Dandy <jda...@asmail.ucdavis.edu>
wrote:

I've read some about the DHCP 80-20 rule but I'm not sure I really
understand it.  Here are two questions.

1) Why 80-20?  Why not 50-50?  If one server fails, wouldn't it be
better for the other server to have a larger range from which to
distribute addresses?

2) Let's say everything is working perfectly and both DHCP servers are
up.  Client1 requests an address and receives address 192.168.0.1 from
DHCPServer1.  Time passes until half of the lease time has expired so
Client1 requests an address.  This time DHCPServer2 is a little faster
and provides address 192.168.0.129.  DHCPserver1 doesn't know that a
different address has been assigned to Client1 so Client1 has an active
lease on both DHCP servers although only one of the addresses is
functional.  (Perhaps that's not what would happen?)  What happens to
DNS?  Are there now two entries in DNS (192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.129)
for Client1?  For the purpose of answering this question, please assume
that I have Active Directory Integrated DNS on Server 2003 and DHCP on
Windows Server 2008.

Thanks for your help.

Curt Finley

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

 

 

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to