I have to agree.  What's the harm in leaving in a feature that is working
perfectly well?   We see this all the time, working features removed from
upgraded products.  They tried to do the same with PF's and we pushed back,
and hopefully PF's will continue for the forseeable future.  I guess it's
too late to reverse the decision on SIS, but MS needs to understand that
pulling features has consequences.

Not to mention, just because running more cheap SATA drives is an
alternative to SIS, doesn't make it a good idea.  Running more drives means
higher power consumption, more rack/floor space.  Did MS miss the "green"
bus here?  There's public relations gold in being able to advertise green.

Carl

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Amusing

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Brian Desmond <br...@briandesmond.com>
wrote:
> OK so before we go down the Exchange 2010 sucks because I think I
> need single instance [attachment] storage route, let's look at some
> other new stuff:

  I'm not saying Exchange 2010 doesn't bring anything to the table.
It has a lot of really interesting features.  For us, I know, the
archiving capabilities are *really* interesting.

  But here's the thing: If someone has a product that has features
that one uses today, and the next release of the product takes away
those features, that's a step backwards.  It doesn't matter that the
new release is faster/lower/longer/wider, if it doesn't deliver what
we're depending on today.

  Since we're using bad analogies: Look at your car.  Say next year's
model has a better radio, GPS navigation, power seats, and a built-in
hibachi grill.  But it gets 1/2 as many miles to the gallon.  What do
you care more about?

  (Again, scalability upward doesn't matter to us small shops.  We
don't care if you can run 3000 users per server where you could only
run 1000 before.  We only have 70 users; other small shops will have
fewer, or a few hundred, tops.)

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to