It's a setting in the GPO. It simply adds permissions, it wont remove existing permissions if the folder exists. Haven't looked to see if it doesn't affect parent permissions that apply to child objects when the folder doesn't exist initially, but I would assume it doesn't. May have to test that one (our provisioning creates the user folder(s) so I have not run into it yet).
-troy From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:11 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mandatory profiles? When you say exclusive do you mean full control, or are they the only ones that have access? ________________________________ From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 10:50 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Mandatory profiles? Are your profile areas set to give the user exclusive access? I found problems with GPO application from 2008 AD till I overrode that setting 2009/6/17 Owens, Michael <michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov> Actually no one from XP will be logging on to it, only Server 2008. I just tried the XP because I was out of ideas. I took what I learned from you guys, applied it, and now the profiles are working flawlessly. But here is what is wierd. If the profile takes, the group policies do not apply. If I remove the users access to the profile (something I would thinl would be completely unrelated to GPO) the group policy doesnt apply? I've tinkered with it for the last few days and can't put my finger on it. Also, in the v2 profile there is no ntuser.dat? there is an ntuser.dat.log. is this correct? ________________________________ From: Kelsey, John [mailto:jckel...@drmc.org] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 1:28 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mandatory profiles? Vista profiles are stored in a completely different folder structure than XP. If you need to use the same profile on both XP and Vista, the 'recommended' way is with folder redirection in a GPO. Here is a good link. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc766489.aspx ******************************* John C. Kelsey DuBois Regional Medical Center (: 814.375.3073 *: jckel...@drmc.org <mailto:jckel...@drmc.org> ******************************* -----Original Message----- From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 12:46 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mandatory profiles? I see. We are having an issue where event viewer says that it cannot gain access to the profiles, but it works on an XP machine.... and I can navigate to it. Very strange. ________________________________ From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 12:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mandatory profiles? We have had issues with roaming profiles, but it was due to lack of understanding (on my part) about changes in roaming profiles and redirection in Vista. - Bob Fronk P Please print only as needed. From: Owens, Michael [mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 11:11 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Mandatory profiles? Has anyone had any problem with mandatory profiles in vista, or server 2008? ________________________________ This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code. ________________________________ This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. ________________________________ This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code. ________________________________ This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
