More to the point, this _IS_ TVK in the blue pants, right?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMnk7lh9M3o -sc From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 3:51 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Security by obscurity? He has not, he prefers to take little boys camping in his spare time. Shook From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 3:48 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Security by obscurity? TVK, have you ever been in a Turkish Prison? Just asking. -sc From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 3:44 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Security by obscurity? You always have gone both ways ShookieBaby! From: Andy Shook [mailto:andy.sh...@peak10.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 9:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Security by obscurity? I can see it either way. If you use the obscure name, then just tell your user base to friggin' bookmark the site. Shook From: David Lum [mailto:david....@nwea.org] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 4:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Security by obscurity? I am having a discussion with some of my fellow SE's, they think having OWA's address be hostname.domain.com/exchange instead of mail.companyname.com for "security by obscurity" reasons. I think it's more overhead/help tickets than it worth. Comments? David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
