The problem I was having was part of Server 2008. if you logged in once before with a user profile and you get a temp profile, it will continue to load the temp profile until you manually delete the registry key corresponding to that user.
The profile keys can be found in the following locations: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\ProfileList Go through carefully and find the key on the right that corresponds to the ProfileImagePath, then delete it. Launch the remote session again and see if you still have the temp profile being created, it may also be a permissions problem. ________________________________ From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 2:22 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server 2008 fail/ My fail? Yes I go to the parent folder Edit the list and Add Administrators. I am doing the opposite I am removing permissions I have to Remove the user/group from the list. It is kind of a pain but it works when I get it right. It also makes it quicker to force changes down. Jon On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Owens, Michael <michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov<mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov>> wrote: Heres what is going on. I have a share, that TS profiles get created on. Only that account has access to them, and system. For some reason it takes away administrators - I would like to add a group, to the parent folder, to propogate to all child objects created. Does that make sense? ________________________________ From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com<mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com>] Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 1:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Server 2008 fail/ My fail? I have been doing that for the last week while I move from 2003 to 2008. Look at the Security Tab bottom Advanced then Edit then Edit again then Apply To. Will this not work or do you want to Add a group/person/etc. If you are adding then the second Edit should be Add instead. Jon On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Owens, Michael <michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov<mailto:michael.ow...@dys.ohio.gov>> wrote: Does anyone know why they got rid of the option to "replace permission entries on all child objects with entries shown here that apply to child objects?" Or did they move it? ________________________________ This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code. ________________________________ This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code. ________________________________ This message, and any response to it, may constitute a public record and thus may be publicly available to anyone who requests it in accordance with Chapter 149 of the Ohio Revised Code. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
