In the article below. Can we actually measure the speed of light with our primitive equipment? Is light a wave or particle? I do not think it can be both. Is this a Shrodinger cat paradox? Can we ever create a "true" vacuum?
Stay tuned for another episode of "NTSYSADMIN" solving the big questions of the 22nd century. > >---------- >Subject: RE: OT: Star Trek Science Fiction? >Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:41:55 -0400 >From: scaes...@caesare.com >To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com > ><http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v406/n6793/full/406243a0.html>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v406/n6793/full/406243a0.html > > > >-sc > > > >From: paul chinnery [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 4:32 PM >To: NT System Admin Issues >Subject: RE: OT: Star Trek Science Fiction? > > > >Well, there is entanglement. I don't remember >reading about others, though. What were they? > > >---------- >Subject: RE: OT: Star Trek Science Fiction? >Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:37:40 -0400 >From: scaes...@caesare.com >To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com > >There is indeed experimental proof of FTL travel. > > > >-sc > > > >From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 2:59 PM >To: NT System Admin Issues >Subject: Re: OT: Star Trek Science Fiction? > > > >Sorry the faster than light travel is at the >math modeling level not the functional model level. > > > >Jon > >On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jon Harris ><<mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com>jk.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >They have already done the computers that talk, >transporters at the molecular level, and proved >the existance of anti-matter. It will only be >time before it is all true. Scientist are also >working on faster than light travel and have two working models now. > > > >Jon > >On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Micheal >Espinola Jr ><<mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com>michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >Awesome. > >-- >ME2 > > > > >On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Sherry >Abercrombie<<mailto:saber...@gmail.com>saber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > <http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,535252,00.html>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,535252,00.html > > > > -- > > Sherry Abercrombie > > > > "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." > > Arthur C. Clarke > > > > > > > > > >~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ >~ ><<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> > >~ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >---------- >NEW mobile Hotmail. Optimized for YOUR phone. ><http://windowslive.com/Mobile?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_CS_MB_new_hotmail_072009>Click > >here. > > > > > > > > > >---------- >Windows Live Hotmail®: Search, add, and share >the webs latest sports videos. ><http://www.windowslive.com/Online/Hotmail/Campaign/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_QA_HM_sports_videos_072009&cat=sports>Check > >it out. > > > > > --------Andy-Ofalt---863-3449------405-Ag-Admin-Bldg------for more information go to http://ict.cas.psu.edu/Contacts.html ---------- My little blurb to eat up bandwidth and make your mail box even larger +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The real problem is that IP, a connectionless protocol, was never developed to be the universal protocol. ATM was developed to serve that purpose and failed. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
