I would take a look at the Exchange list as suggested, and look specifically for a discussion on Exchange 2007 as the subject, last post to it was yesterday. Michael B. Smith makes some really interesting, and for me compelling reasons, about the cons of Exchange 2010, including the fact that continuous replication in both forms are gone.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Bryan Garmon <bryan.gar...@gmail.com>wrote: > There is no upgrade for either 2007 or 2010 so using new hardware isn't > really a choice - it's the only option. They call it a "migration" - when > what it really should be called is a pain in the backside. I would hit up > the Sunbelt Exchange list with this question as the people on that list but > if it were me, I'd be going to 2010. Regardless of 2007 or 2010 - make sure > you plan for an Outlook upgrade in there as well if you aren't at least up > to Outlook 2007. > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Holstrom, Don <dholst...@nbm.org> wrote: > >> I have been using Exchange 03 here at the Museum for a few years. I have >> Exchange 07 software, we are a non-profit so licenses are cheap. But I was >> wondering if I should skip over 07 and go right to 10. Is this a harder >> upgrade? Impossible? Anyone done it? Either way, I would use another server, >> faster with 6 times the RAM of our 03 machine and run either over Server 08, >> 64-bit. And then transfer over a couple of weeks. One of my admin buddies >> from another firm says best to go with 7, impress everyone, and then go with >> 10 in a year or two. I also have a problem mentioned earlier with too many >> of the employees saving too much in their Inboxes, so I would give them an >> increase to save even more ridiculous stuff. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > -- Sherry Abercrombie "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Arthur C. Clarke Sent from Newark, TX, United States ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
