Not in the earlier versions. The AD integration only lets you use AD accounts/groups for security at the share level. Maybe the TeraStation III fixes that.
Ben M. Schorr Chief Executive Officer ______________________________________________ Roland Schorr & Tower www.rolandschorr.com <http://www.rolandschorr.com/> b...@rolandschorr.com From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 10:26 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Buffalo TeraStation III I seem to recall some type of integration with AD for file/folder level permissions. Roger Wright ___ Sent from Tampa, FL, United States On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Ben Schorr <b...@rolandschorr.com> wrote: I haven't looked at the III but the biggest problem we saw with the earlier versions was that there was NO provision for file or folder-level security. You could ONLY apply security at the SHARE level. Which rendered the unit mostly useless for our business clients. I hope they've fixed that because otherwise I really like their devices. Ben M. Schorr Chief Executive Officer ______________________________________________ Roland Schorr & Tower www.rolandschorr.com b...@rolandschorr.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Devin Meade [mailto:devin.me...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 9:06 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Buffalo TeraStation III > > We are considering this for a NAS device. I see some rave reviews here on > this newsgroup and on Amazon. I also see some horrific tech support stories > on Amazon reviews. But can you really trust Amazon reviews? I also see a > range of bad / good reviews on cnet.com (most from prior to 2008, but one > from 4 mos ago). The majority of the negative reviews are for replacement > hard drives, that ought to be easy-peasy-lemon-squeazy to fix. Hmmkay. > Anyway I see that they have new firmware which fixes a multitude of > problems. I see good reviews for the most part for the last year or so - > maybe they have their ducks lined up now. > > Has anyone used one of these AND had a disk failure that was resolved like it > should be? > > http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/nas/nas-reviews/30790-the-terastation- > reborn-buffalo-terastation-iii-reviewed > I see they are using SATA 3. That was too hard to find out. > > http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/index.php?option=com_nas&Itemid=&ch > art=12 > Shows 55MB / sec write performance - on a 2 drive setup. No RAID5 > numbers??? > > Does anyone have a RAID5 setup and have write performance numbers? We > are considering the 4 drive array using 2TB drives (giving us 6TB usable). > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
