And it was more expensive. :)

 
-ASB: http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker
 Sent from my Verizon Smartphone

-----Original Message-----
From: "Steven M. Caesare" <scaes...@caesare.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:08:05 
To: NT System Admin Issues<ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
Subject: RE: CompTIA certs

Never played with TR either. It was superior to Ethernet in many ways 
(particularly the 16Mbps flavor), but seemed to suffer from practicality issues.

-sc

-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 4:46 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: CompTIA certs

Oh, yes.

I was at Nordstrom for quite a while, and the PS/2 line was well entrenched, 
and pretty darn reliable. We used it with 16mbit TokenRing over Cat3, of which 
I pulled more than a little, and used SNA as well with a terminal program from 
Attachmate. Token Ring cards from Madge, Intel and one other the name of which 
I can't remember. Synoptics switches (not called switches, but it's been too 
long for me to remember the technical term)

Gads. That brings back memories...

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 13:14, Steven M. Caesare <scaes...@caesare.com> wrote:
> Yup, Compaq and the Gang of Nine.... HP, Compaq (back when they were 
> separate!), and several others did EISA to get back at IBM....
>
> Did anybody here really buy in to PS/2's where they worked??
>
> -sc
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu]
>> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 4:02 PM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: RE: CompTIA certs
>>
>> I don't think Compaq ever touched it. As I recall, they were one of 
>> the major players in the EISA attempt to overthrow MCA.
>>
>> NCR definitely used MCA as I think did NEC.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 4:00 PM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: RE: CompTIA certs
>>
>> IBM, Compaq, and... ?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 2:24 PM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: Re: CompTIA certs
>>
>> Name three companies that used MCA, sir, and I'll give you a cookie 
>> the next time I see you.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:31, Maglinger, Paul <pmaglin...@scvl.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Microchannel…
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 1:17 PM
>> > To: NT System Admin Issues
>> > Subject: RE: CompTIA certs
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Ok, I’m not very old (at least I don’t consider myself to be), but 
>> > thanks for making me feel even older now! J
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > And how about the nifty LED displays that showed at what speed the 
>> > CPU was operating, along with the “Turbo” button?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I can’t tell you how disappointed I was when I realized it was just 
>> > a bunch of jumpers that I could program myself…
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
>> > Technology Coordinator
>> > Eagle Physicians & Associates, PA
>> >
>> > jra...@eaglemds.com
>> > www.eaglemds.com
>> > ________________________________
>> >
>> > From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 2:09 PM
>> > To: NT System Admin Issues
>> > Subject: RE: CompTIA certs
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yep!  And how to install EISA cards using bear skins and stone knives.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 12:38 PM
>> > To: NT System Admin Issues
>> > Subject: RE: CompTIA certs
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Seriously?!? Wasn’t like that when I took it either back in ‘99.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Sheesh.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Of course back then they also covered 8 bit vs 16 bit ISA, IRQ, and 
>> > DMA…
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
>> > Technology Coordinator
>> > Eagle Physicians & Associates, PA
>> > jra...@eaglemds.com
>> > www.eaglemds.com
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> >
>> > From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 10:37 AM
>> > To: NT System Admin Issues
>> > Subject: RE: CompTIA certs
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I just spoke with someone who recently got the A+.  He was very 
>> > disappointed in the test.  It seems that it deals more now with IT 
>> > professionalism than technical expertise.  An example question he 
>> > gave me was, “ You are working in a company’s Payroll department 
>> > and notice some confidential papers on the desk.  What do you do?”   
>> > It wasn’t like
>> that when I took it.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
>> > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 9:24 AM
>> > To: NT System Admin Issues
>> > Subject: RE: CompTIA certs
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > You’ve gotta start somewhere, though. I started with A+, Network+, 
>> > and
>> > I-Net+ just to get some (relatively) easy letters after my name.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > That was a few years ago, and hopefully the A+ exam in particular 
>> > has changed. I had been building and repairing computers for years 
>> > when I took it, but still had to study a fair amount because I 
>> > found that the exam wasn’t quite aligned with the real world. Which 
>> > I guess can be said of most exams.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > John
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 10:08 AM
>> > To: NT System Admin Issues
>> > Subject: RE: CompTIA certs
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > IMHO these are very baseline certs. With 15+ years, you should be 
>> > looking at more advanced certification.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > Ken
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: paul d [mailto:pdw1...@hotmail.com]
>> > Sent: Monday, 1 March 2010 10:06 PM
>> > To: NT System Admin Issues
>> > Subject: RE: CompTIA certs
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks, guys. I do have 15+ years.  Just looking into maybe getting a few.
>> > There's a "whiff" of outsourcing in the air.  And, at my age, 
>> > getting another IT job won't be easy.
>> >
>> >> From: jra...@eaglemds.com
>> >> To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
>> >> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:50:16 -0500
>> >> Subject: RE: CompTIA certs
>> >>
>> >> +1 They are (and should be) easy compared to a Cisco or M$ cert; 
>> >> +as Erik
>> >> stated, they are good for a baseline. Also, keep in mind that 
>> >> since CompTIA is vendor-neutral, they can't go to the granularity 
>> >> that a vendor specific exam tends to cover.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written 
>> > communications to or from this entity are public records that will 
>> > be disclosed to the public and the media upon request. E-mail 
>> > communications may be subject to public disclosure.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> >
>> > Any medical information contained in this electronic message is 
>> > CONFIDENTIAL and privileged. It is unlawful for unauthorized 
>> > persons to view, copy, disclose, or disseminate CONFIDENTIAL 
>> > information. This electronic message may contain information that 
>> > is confidential and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for 
>> > the use of the
>> > individual(s) and/or entity named as recipients in the message. If 
>> > you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify 
>> > the sender immediately and delete this material from your computer. 
>> > Do not deliver, distribute or copy this message, and do not 
>> > disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on the information 
>> > that it contains.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
>> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
>> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
>> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
> <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
<http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Reply via email to