You should do it with transport rules so a message can be re-signed. In my opinion.
Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Jeff S. Gottlieb [mailto:jeff.s.gottl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 11:35 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: VIPER: NO Disclaimers in email (caused by email digital certificates) Kevin, I reworded and reposted this thread (minutes ago) hoping to stimulate more discussion...and before knowing you replied. Thank you. Interesting enough Sunbelt support, "never saw anyone using a email digital certificate"...thus could not offer a remedy. We do not represent the defense department so we can live without certificates, but since we are using, and with issues *maybe* someone has a quick remedy. Let's assume we were a VERY small minority and needed certificates...is this an issue with COMODO or all certificates in Viper? Based on your logic (below) all certificates would present Viper users with this issue. -J From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:klu...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 7:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: No Disclaimers in VIPER (caused by use of email digital certificates) I have no idea of that is a Viper feature or not, but I believe that is the way you would want it to operate isn't it? Otherwise, the insertion of the disclaimer would be modifying the email message, which would cause the signature to indicate tampering. On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Jeff S. Gottlieb <jeff.s.gottl...@gmail.com<mailto:jeff.s.gottl...@gmail.com>> wrote: We just closed a case with Sunbelt...disclaimers appeared in all email accounts except those using digital certificates. Was wondering if anyone else experienced the same. - Jeff Exchange 2003 Outlook 2007 Digital Security COMODO ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
