On 30 Mar 2010 at 16:07, James Rankin wrote: > I would definitely go with Glen's suggestion then. A lot of devices have a > default 192.168 address type. My boss designed this network as 192.168.x.x, > and we have had a few issues with home-brew routers being installed and > screwing with our network transmissions.
Whenever possible I avoid 192.168.x.x in business networks. It often causes conflicts when a home-user needs a VPN. I like to use IP addressing related to that physical address that gives me a clue about where the machine is. For example, for a network located at 955 West XXXXth, I would use 10.9.55.x for the LAN. Of course, this only works for smallish networks, but that's all I deal with so it works for me ;-) -- Angus Scott-Fleming GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona 1-520-290-5038 Security Blog: http://geoapps.com/ ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
