I've read a good bit in recent weeks and maybe I misread something or read something about an older version, but I am under the impression that DPM cannot be installed in a virtual environment, if that is possible then yeah, I'm good to go with this!!!
Currently we run SCCM and SCOM on the same box, so in a way it makes sense to add DPM, but I share Malcom's concern with regards to mixing SCCM with much of anything. On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Brian Desmond <br...@briandesmond.com> wrote: > Why don't you put HyperV on it and break up the roles? I wouldn't mix all > those three together. > > Thanks, > Brian Desmond > br...@briandesmond.com > > c - 312.731.3132 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Wimberly [mailto:swimbe...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 10:13 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: DPM, SCCM AND SCOM on same box??? > > I am pricing out a DPM box which we are likely to purchase. > > Dell R510 > 16 GB RAM > 2 146GB RAID1 for OS > 12 2TB RAID5 for database & storage pool > > The question is: Would you put SCCM and SCOM on the same box??? > > SCCM and SCOM would use a remote SQL server rather than the same internal > storage. We have fewer than 500 workstations, and DPM would not be used for > workstation backup, only backing up data from 17 servers. > > Design thoughts? > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ > <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ > > ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
