Right but what's using the password? Service on the device or a logon to it 
or...?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com

c   - 312.731.3132

From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 12:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Cc: Brian Desmond
Subject: RE: RADIUS Server

No the embedded devices that will need to write credit card details to the SQL 
Database and get access to the network via RADIUS.
Cheers
Ryan


From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 1:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RADIUS Server

For service accounts?

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com<mailto:br...@briandesmond.com>

c   - 312.731.3132

From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 10:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Cc: Brian Desmond
Subject: RE: RADIUS Server

I would have no problem deploying and upgrading the DCs to 2008R2 that is a 
great idea thank you. Now the only problem is finding a way to handle password 
changes on the embedded CE devices.
Cheers
Ryan


From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 11:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RADIUS Server

Ryan-

If you're going to spend the money on a separate domain (not a great plan IMO) 
you might as well just upgrade the DCs to 2008/2008R2 in your current domain 
and apply a separate password policy to the users in question. If you can get 
your apps that have service accounts on 2008R2 then you can use managed service 
accounts which absolves you of a password policy issue there.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com<mailto:br...@briandesmond.com>

c   - 312.731.3132

From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 10:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RADIUS Server

So a separate domain within the forest will be helpful.  One of the issues I 
need to work out regarding password policies is how we change passwords on the 
embedded CE devices.  The passwords are going to have to be changed every 90 
days.

I was also hoping to have single deployments of BizTalk, System Center Data 
Protection Manager, System Center Operations Manager ect within the forest.

I think the PCI auditor is going to become my new best friend.

Cheers
Ryan


From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 10:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: RADIUS Server

Agreed, re: Scope

Sharing the same production domain will mean that password policies are in 
scope, but as long as physical and network access to the systems in question 
are tightly controlled, the entire domain will not be in scope from a machine 
perspective.

Be advised, however, that for PCI in particular, *networks* can be in scope if 
they contain PII data, or if they contain machines which *access* PII, so plan 
your segmentation carefully, and chat with your friendly neighborhood auditor 
early and often.

ASB (My XeeSM Profile)<http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker>
Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Brian Desmond 
<br...@briandesmond.com<mailto:br...@briandesmond.com>> wrote:
You can setup a trust to a separate forest and use accounts across the trust, 
potentially.

I don't know much about PCI but the customers I've worked with AD has typically 
not been in scope of the PCI Audit/Compliance Requirement as long as the stuff 
in scope for PCI has been appropriately segmented off.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com<mailto:br...@briandesmond.com>

c   - 312.731.313

From: Ryan Finnesey 
[mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com<mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com>]
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 7:42 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Cc: Brian Desmond
Subject: RE: RADIUS Server

After diving deeper into the design requirements it looks like we are going to 
need domain accounts for SQL Server per the SQL PCI compliance white paper.  So 
that adds AD into the design.  What I need to figure out now is do I need to 
deploy a completely separate AD forest or if I can use to one we have in place 
now.  I do not want to open the entire network to a PCI audit.

Cheers
Ryan


From: Brian Desmond 
[mailto:br...@briandesmond.com<mailto:br...@briandesmond.com>]
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 2:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RADIUS Server

Yes it would. In this case NPS makes no sense to you.

You'd need a CAL for each user /or/ device the user is connecting from.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com<mailto:br...@briandesmond.com>

c   - 312.731.3132

From: Ryan Finnesey 
[mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com<mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com>]
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 12:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Cc: Brian Desmond
Subject: RE: RADIUS Server

Right now I do not have DCs or AD in the design.  Would NPS look to AD for the 
username and password information?  I would need a CAL for each device I think.

Cheers
Ryan


From: Brian Desmond 
[mailto:br...@briandesmond.com<mailto:br...@briandesmond.com>]
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 12:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RADIUS Server

I've used IAS (now "NPS") many times - works fine. I imagine it would work fine 
for your Sprint project. You can just install it on your DCs in most cases.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
br...@briandesmond.com<mailto:br...@briandesmond.com>

c   - 312.731.3132

From: Ryan Finnesey 
[mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com<mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com>]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 11:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RADIUS Server

I wanted to get the groups feedback on RADIUS servers.  In the past (NT 
4.0/2000 days) I would of used Funk Software's Steel-Belted Radius but Funk 
Software has been acquired  by Juniper Networks.  We require a RADIUS server to 
authenticate devices connecting to the Sprint 3G/4G Data link service.  Per the 
Data Link install guide



*         Data Link can support proxy authentication to the customer's 
enterprise AAA server running the RADIUS protocol. This equipment is managed by 
the customer and resides on their network.

*         Sprint supports RADIUS ports UDP 1812/1813 and 1645/1646 for 
authentication and accounting.

*         RADIUS "Time to Live" (TTL) is 500 milliseconds on the Data Link 
network and timeouts are set accordingly.  RFC 3344 only supports CHAP-MD5 and 
CHAP requires that the customer authentication server have access to the user 
password in clear text.

*         For static IP implementations, the customer will need to add the 
Framed-IP-Address RADIUS return list attribute to every user with an IP as the 
value.

*         Customer user databases or directories that encrypt the user password 
are not supported.

*         If the customer uses a backend database or LDAP directory, the 
passwords must be stored in clear text.



I would like a server that will support failover, I see there is within Windows 
Server 2008, Network Policy Server (NPS) but I do not know if this is the best 
option and I am still researching if NPS will meet Sprints requirements.  
Thanks in advance for your feedback and recommendations.
Cheers
Ryan



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, 
proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in 
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other 
use of the email by you is prohibited

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to