On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Steven M. Caesare <scaes...@caesare.com> wrote: >> It's interesting to note that Y2K bugs keep happening, even in >> entirely new code. It's amazing how many programmers just don't >> expect users to enter a two-digit year, or assume tm.tm_year is the >> current year not -1900, or whatever. I've saw years like "109" show >> up on Verizon's website as recently as last year. > > Everybody programming now will be dead in 3000... why should they > bother?
Point was, Y2K problems don't show up only around the turn of the century. And 2100 will actually be the next time, not 3000. There's a good chance some people reading this list will be alive for that. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin