On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Steven M. Caesare <scaes...@caesare.com> wrote:
>>  It's interesting to note that Y2K bugs keep happening, even in
>> entirely new code.   It's amazing how many programmers just don't
>> expect users to enter a two-digit year, or assume tm.tm_year is the
>> current year not -1900, or whatever.  I've saw years like "109" show
>> up on Verizon's website as recently as last year.
>
> Everybody programming now will be dead in 3000... why should they
> bother?

  Point was, Y2K problems don't show up only around the turn of the century.

  And 2100 will actually be the next time, not 3000.  There's a good
chance some people reading this list will be alive for that.

-- Ben

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Reply via email to