Perfect! How did you find that? Is there a secret cache of TCL commands
that I've missed?

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Nathan Rusch <[email protected]>
wrote:

> [dependent_nodes -ih this] will get you a TCL list of all of the dependent
> nodes based on input pipes (but not expression links). From there, you can
> index it as needed:
>
> [lindex [dependent_nodes -ih this] 0]
>
> -Nathan
>
>
> *From:* Den Serras <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2015 12:30 PM
> *To:* Nuke Python discussion <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* [Nuke-python] Downstream nodes - via TCL
>
> Hey I need to grab some knob info from a known node downstream of a given
> node. I can use [python
> nuke.thisNode().dependent()[0].dependent()[0].etc()] but I wonder if
> there's a TCL version of this that will go faster without python. TCL
> [value input.input.input.knob] works great and is very fast, I figure there
> must be a similar for down but I can't find it...
>
> Anyone have a trick for this?
>
> Thanks!
> Den
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-python mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-python
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-python mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-python
>
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-python mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-python

Reply via email to