At a previous gig, we had Nuke executables and studio tools/configuration centrally located on the same SAN that housed our sources and scripts. If there was ever an outage on that system, we'd be down anyway, so I don't believe it reduced our reliability. Having centralized installs and configuration certainly simplified my life because I could roll out new software/scripts/gizmos/show setups without having to make sure each workstation was updated.
I think this worked well because we were a small facility. My expectation would be that once you get big enough to need systems guys, you're probably big enough to task those guys with working out how to manage all your soft and configuration. -t On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Gary Jaeger <[email protected]> wrote: > so now that we finally have our house in order with a central > plug-in/gizmo/whatever install and the NUKE_PATH set, I'm wondering if it > makes sense to do a central install of the binaries? It would be nice if > all the workstations and render nodes are all on the same version, all the > time. How do people manage that? > > -- > Gary Jaeger // Core Studio > 249 Princeton Avenue > Half Moon Bay, CA 94019 > 650 728 7060 > http://corestudio.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
