try this:
Use a colour convert node but before that use a grade to set black to 0 and 
white to white.
Then reverse the process for the output. Dont use the Read's convert,

to covert blacks and white set

blackpoint 16/256
whitepoint 235/256

it might be 16/255 and 235/255 but I think it the above.
To reverse use the reverse button in the grade or add these values to lift/gain 
instead

 
Howard



>________________________________
> From: Ed Mendez <[email protected]>
>To: nuke usergroup <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Wednesday, 4 January 2012, 20:13
>Subject: [Nuke-users] Video Range vs Full Range on Rec709 Files?
> 
>
> 
>We are running into a slight offset in color/levels between ProRes422HQ 
>fileson different systems. Resolve, Smoke, and Nuke. Just wondering if anyone 
>has run into a similar issue? I don't believe it is a .mov gamma flag thing, 
>but I could be wrong...
>
>We rendered some Rec709 ProRes422HQ files out of Resolve to DPX – no color 
>correction added.  When the resulting DPX sequence was brought back into 
>Resolve and compared to the original ProRes file – everything (colors/levels) 
>matched nicely.  They also matched when compared in Smoke.  However, when the 
>ProRes file was compared to the DPX files in NUKE the ProRes file looks like 
>it is being read as video range while the DPX sequence is being read as full 
>range.  Consequently the blacks are lifted and the whites dropped when looking 
>at the DPX sequence.  The read nodes for each the ProRes and DPX's are both 
>set to Rec709 as is the display. Equally there is a similar offset when 
>setting the read nodes to any of the other colorspaces as well...
> 
>To add to the matter – when the same ProRes file is rendered out of Nuke via 
>Rec709  in a write node, the resulting DPX sequence will match the ProRes when 
>viewing back in Nuke…  
> 
>Is there any way to tell Nuke to read a file as full range or video range? Or 
>is the another way to address this issue?
>
>Thanks, 
>ed
>
>_______________________________________________
>Nuke-users mailing list
>[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to