Howard is right.
What you referred to, Matan, is aligning the world. What Randy is asking
for is helpers for the Solve process of the trac
You have my vote, Randy. I'll email support. Is there a ticket number for
this already?

Ron Ganbar
email: [email protected]
tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
     +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/



On 17 January 2012 12:42, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote:

> No - normally you can take a set of points that are lying on the floor say
> - and tell the tracker that these all live on one plane, this then enables
> the tracker to resolve based on this information.
> Plus makes it easier t understand the point cloud.
>
> Aligning the camera is, if I understand you correctly, a way of getting
> the floor to be back on the floor plane of the scene, so the world is a
> sensible way up.
>
> Its a useful tool, odd that hasn't been requested before.
>
> Howard
>
>    ------------------------------
> *From:* Matan Arbel <[email protected]>
> *To:* Nuke user discussion <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 17 January 2012, 10:15
> *Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] 3d tracker contraints
>
> U can set the plains by selecting all the points for xy plain and aline
> the camera.
> Did u mean that?
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Matan Arbel
> Motion/Graphic Designer
> matanarbel.com
>
> On Jan 17, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Randy Little <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Do you mean you can constrain or you can put a card or object attached to
> a tracker point? That is odd if you can constrain in the AE plug in and not
> in Nuke.
>
>
> Randy S. Little
> http://reel.rslittle.com
> http://imdb.com/name/nm2325729/
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/rslittle>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 23:53, Matan Arbel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If I remember correctly. And let me know if I'm wrong. They have this in
> the camera track plugin for AE. So it's weird they haven't built it in the
> nuke tracker.
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Matan Arbel
> Motion/Graphic Designer
> matanarbel.com
>
> On Jan 17, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Randy Little <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> In every real 3d tracker you can select tracks and then tell the tracker
> these points on on the same plan x,y, x, xy xz or yz.     This then allows
> for a recalculation for the camera for a more accurate track. some times
> this is a process done repeatedly to get a perfect track with the tracking
> data placed properly where it should exist in the scene.   As it stands now
> there is no way to selected a group of trackers and tell the cameratracker
> that these points are supposed to be on the same plan and recalculate based
> on this constraint.  As anyone who has ever done any 3d tracking is well
> aware its pretty common to do a track see the point cloud and shake your
> head.  In all those apps its a salvageable situation.  Its usually a
> required situation.
>
> Randy S. Little
> http://reel.rslittle.com
> http://imdb.com/name/nm2325729/
>  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/rslittle>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 21:38, Ron Ganbar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> What do you mean by constrain here, Randy?
>
>
> Ron Ganbar
> email: [email protected]
> tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
>      +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
> url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
>
>
>
> On 17 January 2012 00:34, Randy Little <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> can everyone that wants the 3d tracker to have constraints please go and
> add a feature request.  Seems they haven't ever had anyone ask for the
> ability to constrain in the camera tracker.  ??????
> Randy S. Little
> http://www.rslittle.com <http://reel.rslittle.com>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to