Yes but then you can always run more than one in a row etc... or I you could 
make a simplified version of the tool (does one at a time)
In the end of the day I'm not rebuilding the hue tool as its already there.

This is only a quick test but shows its possible (need secondary colour to test 
this)

set cut_paste_input [stack 0]
version 6.3 v8
ColorWheel {
 inputs 0
 gamma 0.45
 name ColorWheel1
 selected true
 xpos -223
 ypos 33
}
Group {
 name Group1
 selected true
 xpos -223
 ypos 124
 addUserKnob {20 User}
 addUserKnob {41 add l offset T Grade1.add}
}
 Input {
  inputs 0
  name Input1
  xpos -89
  ypos 261
 }
 Colorspace {
  colorspace_out HSV
  name Colorspace1
  xpos -89
  ypos 301
 }
 Grade {
  add {1.3 0 0 0}
  black_clamp false
  name Grade1
  selected true
  xpos -89
  ypos 347
 }
 Colorspace {
  colorspace_in HSV
  name Colorspace2
  xpos -89
  ypos 392
 }
 Output {
  name Output1
  xpos -89
  ypos 492
 }
end_group
secondaryColour2 {
 name SeondaryColour
 note_font Arial
 selected true
 xpos -223
 ypos 212
 RedKnob {0.18 0.18 0.18}
 vibrancyControls 0
}
Group {
 name Group2
 selected true
 xpos -221
 ypos 310
 addUserKnob {20 User}
 addUserKnob {41 add l offset T Grade1.add}
}
 Input {
  inputs 0
  name Input1
  xpos -89
  ypos 261
 }
 Colorspace {
  colorspace_out HSV
  name Colorspace1
  xpos -89
  ypos 301
 }
 Grade {
  add {{-parent.parent.Group1.Grade1.add.r i} 0 0 0}
  black_clamp false
  name Grade1
  selected true
  xpos -89
  ypos 347
 }
 Colorspace {
  colorspace_in HSV
  name Colorspace2
  xpos -89
  ypos 392
 }
 Output {
  name Output1
  xpos -89
  ypos 492
 }
end_group





>________________________________
> From: Ron Ganbar <[email protected]>
>To: Howard Jones <[email protected]>; Nuke user discussion 
><[email protected]> 
>Sent: Tuesday, 7 August 2012, 12:56
>Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Re: Photoshop equivilents
> 
>
>But won't that move the Hue for all the primaries and secondaries in unison? 
>Plus with the HueKeyer we can also control how wide the controlled area is, 
>not just where it sits.
>
>
>
>Ron Ganbar
>email: [email protected]
>tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
>     +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
>url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
>
>
>
>On 7 August 2012 14:54, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>I suspect if I added a basic hue shift into the top of secondary colour and 
>reversed same out,  I could create a hue-shiftable version of the tool.
>>
>>
>> 
>>Howard
>>
>>
>>
>>>________________________________
>>> From: Ron Ganbar <[email protected]>
>>>To: [email protected] 
>>>Sent: Tuesday, 7 August 2012, 12:43
>>>
>>>Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Re: Photoshop equivilents
>>> 
>>>
>>>It's the other way around.
>>>Using a mask with color correction always has the potential for edges like 
>>>this. It depends on the mask and that's true for any software.
>>>The difference here is Howards method, which did not use keying at all, but 
>>>instead used simple math to breakup the image into primaries and 
>>>secondaries. This however, does not allow for changes in the "width" of the 
>>>hue you are controlling.
>>>
>>>I was mimicking the Adobe way completely. The Hue & Sat effect has a hue 
>>>keyer built into it, and I use it often, and so it was important for me to 
>>>keep it.
>>>I'm about to publish a new version that builds the various parts up in a 
>>>different way and produces, what I think, are better, smoother results. If 
>>>you can send me a frame of your car, I can take a look what it does to it 
>>>first, and only then upload to Nukepedia.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Ron Ganbar
>>>email: [email protected]
>>>tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
>>>     +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
>>>url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On 7 August 2012 14:34, irwit <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>>>You mentioned that the issue is not the hue keyer but it is the way the 
>>>>mask is used?  I'm not sure how else to use the mask except to plug it into 
>>>>the mask slot? So my question is how would you use the mask to not leave 
>>>>that type of edge when colour correcting using it?
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Nuke-users mailing list
>>>[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Nuke-users mailing list
>>[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to