That is a good idea and simplifies the script's readability, with the caveat that the roto matte is sampled/ softened and the track is applied to the whole roto node, instead of individual masks.
Sent from iEarth On 15/10/2012, at 1:29, "itaibachar" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Ron! > I was trying just that, as a Flame guy, to parent the roto with a transform > axis, "out in the open", as I'm used to, > not hidden in the roto's something-something's layer, but to no avail. > Transform node has no influence on the roto's position for some reason I cant > get. > So I thought, maybe because the roto is linked to the tracker's animation, so > I copy/pasted that info instead of a link, but still nothing moved... > This is where I had to ask the experts. > So how should I move the roto "flame" style? > Thanks > following your book btw > <Capture.JPG> > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
