Never had much luck with the deNoise in Nuke, specially in footages with extreme grain. Neat on the other hand never failed on me.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Marten Blumen <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I find the new deNoise is very good, Neat is a step above it but deNoise > can be enough. > > > On 13 November 2012 07:08, chris <ze.m...@gmx.net> wrote: > >> On 11/9/12 at 8:25 PM, (Deke Kincaid) wrote: >> >>> Have you messed with the “new” 6.3 denoise tool? >>> >> >> i was really looking forward to that when it was announced, but >> unfortunately i haven't managed to good results using it so far :/ >> >> i always assumed that i must be doing something wrong, but after several >> attempts, watching tutorials etc i kinda gave up and went back to neat >> video (like most other people here it seems). >> >> ++ chris >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.**co.uk<Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk>, >> http://forums.thefoundry.co.**uk/ <http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/> >> http://support.thefoundry.co.**uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**nuke-users<http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
