Well you should have lots coming from me - usually marked ‘!!!’ or ‘!?!!’ etc - 
as I have got fed up filling the report in.
;) 


>  On 14 May 2015, at 18:42, Frank Harrison <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 14 May 2015 at 15:20, Howard Jones <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I’m suspecting that because Nuke9 seems somewhat flakey with more crashes 
> than I had with 8 (apart from Tracker where the opposite was true) these are 
> not being cleaned up.
> Hmm, our crash-report system would argue against 9 being more flaky than 8; 
> that said, please, please let me (or support) know if you get any concrete 
> repro steps for flakeyness :)
> 
> Where you might see some issues, even in 9.0v5, are the occasional issues 
> with Keylight and other OFX-based plugins when the requesting bounding box 
> down-stream changes often, for example having Blur downstream of a Keylight 
> and moving the size-slider - this is be fixed ready for the next v-release 
> that is in the final stage of testing.
> 
> F.
> -- 
> Frank Harrison
> Senior Nuke Software Engineer
> The Foundry
> Tel: +44 (0)20 7968 6828 - Fax: +44 (0)20 7930 8906 
> Web: www.thefoundry.co.uk <http://www.thefoundry.co.uk/>
> Email: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>  
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to