It’s ok - I have now (re)found the issue There is a gamma2.4 which isn’t in the list - which has come from having a nuke8 template in nuke9.
I wish they would sort this bug/feature out. H > On 13 Nov 2015, at 11:14, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > Further to this - this is the difference I have between AlexaLogC in nuke 8 > (left) AlexaLogC in nuke9 (right). > The image is really flat and the curve is very different. Can anyone confirm > deny the righthand curve. > > I’m suspecting the curves are out of sync ala the LUT bug. > > Nuke Support please see below thread. > > Thanks > H > > <Screen Shot 2015-11-13 at 11.07.21.png> > >> On 26 Oct 2015, at 20:09, Deke Kincaid <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I was incorrect about the matrices change. What you are seeing may just be >> the bug which Bruno mentioned. I am not sure. It is probably best to talk >> to support if you are seeing a major differences. >> >> Joseph Goldstone from Arri was having trouble getting on the mailing list >> but he asked me to post this to the list: >> There would have been a change of matrices with the introduction of SUP 3.0 >> around December of 2010 or January of 2011. That was when Log C V3 was >> introduced. >> And then with the introduction of the ALEXA Studio, with its optional >> slide-into-place internal ND, there was a new matrix set introduced, but the >> old matrices still applied when you didn’t have the ND slid into place. >> (There was no optics supplier on earth who could give us perfect spectral >> flatness given how thin the ND has to be—the optical path is compressed on >> the Studio because of the mechanical mirror shutter that supports the >> optical viewfinder. So we shipped new matrices. That was in December of 2011. >> The response of the ALEXA 65 sensor is slightly different than that of the >> smaller more traditional 35mm sensors, so we introduced new matrices to >> support it in the SDK that went out this summer (summer of 2015). >> But if you go out and shoot POA [Plain Old ARRIRAW] today, i.e. not a Studio >> and not an ALEXA65, you are applying the same matrices now that you were in >> January of 2011. We’ve improved our debayering algorithms since then, but we >> provide all the old ones, at least, all the ones since the introduction of >> the ALEXA predecessor, the D-21, which predates my starting at ARRI in >> January of 2011. We revere stability — three fully backwards-compatible >> matrix updates in 4.5 years >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Deke Kincaid <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> I don’t know. You would have to ask the folks at Arri. >> >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Howard Jones <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Thanks Deke >> >> It's a very different sdk then. Any idea why such a big change? >> >> Howard >> >> On 23 Oct 2015, at 10:38 p.m., Deke Kincaid <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> Ari will often change and refine their color matrices between sdk versions. >>> So even though people make fun of Red's endless color versions(RedGammaX >>> and Red/DragonColorX), at-least you can always get to an older version when >>> they change theirs. Hiero 1.9 has the same SDK as Nuke 8. You would need >>> Hiero 9.x to get the same SDK as Nuke 9.x. >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Howard Jones <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> I’ve been looking at raw alexa files converted to linear in nuke8 and >>> nuke9. Nuke9 seems screwed or is it a feature (doesn’t match Hiero 1.9v1)!! >>> >>> Howard_______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>, >>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ <http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/> >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> <http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>, >>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ <http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/> >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> <http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>, >> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ <http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/> >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> <http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>, >> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ <http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/> >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> <http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users>
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
