>>Anybody feels like taking this on? Nukepedia?
Interesting proposition but it would drag Nukepedia into political hot
water.
I have seen rating sites like this before for Western vfx studios, and
witnessed the guy who was running it (a colleague of mine at the time)
being forced to shut it down by one of the biggest vfx houses (who shall
remain unnamed).
I wouldn't want to mix this sort of thing with our community tool
sharing site, as it would put it on very thin ice.
frank
On 8/01/16 5:27 am, Ron Ganbar wrote:
Hi there,
I had no dealing with RotoMake, but had dealing with other studios in
the past. Unfortunately, to this day, every India based company I
worked with supplied sub par quality work. I did use a company in
Argentina which did fantastic work, though.
What we need, I think, is a rating system based on user experience for
farm out work such as this. Anybody feels like taking this on? Nukepedia?
Ron Ganbar
email: ron...@gmail.com <mailto:ron...@gmail.com>
tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
+972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:33 PM, adam jones <adam....@mac.com
<mailto:adam....@mac.com>> wrote:
hey all
I wanted to ask what anyones experience with indian company
rotoMake is.
I have recently ganged them to do som work for us, the work was 49
shots, some of these shots had a range of various versions using
different talent shots some probably looking at around 60
individual keys and some roto work on each.
Lets say we submitted the work to them on the 22nd of december and
based on outré requirements we where told the work load would be
delivered on the 25th of december then reassessed to the 27th of
december.
This was no issue for us being it still supported dour own
delivery needs.
how ever we have had to kick back around 85% of there work, reason
being i basically sucked, we even sent them templates for deSpill
methods that replaces the spill with the BG content.
They did not follow this in any way what so ever.
The approaches to doing the key was broadly different from element
to element which brings up the question if it is all done at
rotoMaker the is no QA what so ever of they farm out the work to
other india grunt work studios.
Aside from the cost differences between having and AU artist do
the keys and clean up and getting it right first time, going via
rotoMake truly fucks with our scheduling / deadline commitments.
oh and there versioning and naming conventions are probably the
worst I have ver come across
So to make it basic the question I am asking what is peoples
thoughts on rotoMakes and the quality and organisation in term of
delivery from in my opinion fucking bad wagon jumping hack.
-regards
-adam _______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk
<mailto:Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk>,
http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
--
ohufxLogo 50x50 <http://www.ohufx.com> *vfx compositing
<http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-compositing> | *workflow customisation
and consulting <http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-customising>* *
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
