On 27 January 2016 at 04:48, Daniel Stein <daniel.st...@thefoundry.co.uk>
wrote:

> There is this bug already logged (specific to compiled plugins) if you
> want to reference it in your report.
>
> • BUG ID 39287 - Plug-ins: Loading scripts with plug-ins compiled against
> older versions removes the nodes from the Node Graph.
>
This is a very bad bug, I don't know how it slipped through the cracks
un-noticed. I've increased the priority and escalated it.

Thanks for bringing it to my attention.


> Logged many hours sifting through scripts in text editors and diffs
> tracking these down so happy to see this one getting a bump :)
>
> On 26 January 2016 at 22:25, Frank Rueter|OHUfx <fr...@ohufx.com> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, but without the current nuke behaviour I don't thing there is any
>> way to identify the missing node classes - since there are no nodes to
>> start with any longer.
>> I just reported this so maybe we can figure out a workaround.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 27/01/16 4:21 pm, Martin Constable wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I could write a smart favorites list (which is just a collection of 
>> files to download quickly one go), which scans the current Nuke script for 
>> missing tools and downloads the lot.
>>
>> Thats a great idea! Would love to see it happen.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 27 Jan 2016, at 11:19 am, Frank Rueter|OHUfx <fr...@ohufx.com> 
>> <fr...@ohufx.com> wrote:
>>
>> Cool usage example. This gave me an idea:
>> Maybe I could write a smart favorites list (which is just a collection of 
>> files to download quickly one go), which scans the current Nuke script for 
>> missing tools and downloads the lot.
>>
>> Unfortunately, when I just went to verify this, I noticed that Nuke no 
>> longer creates placeholder nodes for missing gizmos/plugins like it used to 
>> (which is what I was hoping to use to identify the missing tools). Instead 
>> it just skips the missing nodes and destroys the nuke script in the process 
>> (pipes are connected differently as a result).
>> If you save at this stage you have lost production data.
>> That is pretty severe, will send a bug report...
>>
>>
>>
>> On 27/01/16 3:48 pm, Martin Constable wrote:
>>
>> Unbelievably useful! A wonderful tool.
>>
>> I am sometimes faced with the experience of students who has extended Nuke’s 
>> functionality with stuff that they have downloaded from Nukepedia. Laudable 
>> though this is, this makes their scripts unreadable to me if I don’t have 
>> the same tool in my box. I could easily restrict all scripts to those which 
>> can be read by a box fresh factory install, but I don’t want to punish their 
>> initiative. This makes keeping up to speed all the more easy.
>>
>> Thanks again.
>>
>> Martin C
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 27 Jan 2016, at 8:32 am, Daniel Short <danisnotsh...@gmail.com> 
>> <danisnotsh...@gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>
>> Wow Frank, what a feat!
>> This'll be a great tool to explore more of what the site has to offer, and 
>> have it all where I need it.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Jason Huang <jasonhuang1...@gmail.com> 
>> <jasonhuang1...@gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>> Thanks so much Frank! I can quit bookmarking favorite gizmos with 
>> corresponding categories after this....
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Frank Rueter|OHUfx <fr...@ohufx.com> 
>> <fr...@ohufx.com>
>>  wrote:
>> exactly :-D
>>
>>
>> On 27/01/16 10:01 am, Hugo Léveillé wrote:
>>
>>
>> Oh! So that's the panel that needs to be always on top ;)
>>
>> Thanks Frank, looks great
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jan 26, 2016, at 3:56 PM, Frank Rueter|OHUfx <fr...@ohufx.com> 
>> <fr...@ohufx.com>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I know, right? Took over 1000 hours of work to get to this stage, not long 
>> now though :)
>>
>> When I showed a prototype at Siggraph ages ago I really intended to have it 
>> ready soon after, haha.
>> Good thing is the delay made PySide available to write a much better UI than 
>> what I had going with the Nuke panels back then.
>>
>>
>> On 27/01/16 9:39 am, Diogo Girondi wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> Nice to see that coming out after years in the furnace. Congrats on all the 
>> work done.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Diogo
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:23 PM Frank Rueter|OHUfx <fr...@ohufx.com> 
>> <fr...@ohufx.com>
>>  wrote:
>> With over 1000 tool in the database it's time for something like this:
>> http://www.nukepedia.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>      vfx compositing | workflow customisation and consulting 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, 
>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, 
>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>> --
>> <ohufxLogo_50x50.png>        vfx compositing | workflow customisation and 
>> consulting
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, 
>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, 
>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>> --
>> <ohufxLogo_50x50.png>        vfx compositing | workflow customisation and 
>> consulting
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, 
>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, 
>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Short
>> www.danisnotshort.com
>> 215.859.3220
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, 
>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, 
>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>> --
>> <ohufxLogo_50x50.png>        vfx compositing | workflow customisation and 
>> consulting _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing listnuke-us...@support.thefoundry.co.uk, 
>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing listnuke-us...@support.thefoundry.co.uk, 
>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> [image: ohufxLogo 50x50] <http://www.ohufx.com> *vfx compositing
>> <http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-compositing> | workflow customisation and
>> consulting <http://ohufx.com/index.php/vfx-customising> *
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>



-- 
Frank Harrison
Senior Nuke Software Engineer
The Foundry
Tel: +44 (0)20 7968 6828 - Fax: +44 (0)20 7930 8906
Web: www.thefoundry.co.uk
Email: frank.harri...@thefoundry.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to