We still do delay adding them, for exactly that reason. And we have
explorer open up the root of those mapped drives on startup, because
sometimes if you re-add an existing share it doesn't really gell properly
and you end up with the little red x. If you just double click it (or
launch explorer opening there) it works fine, but if you don't other
software (ie Nuke running as a render node) doesn't seem to. It's not
exactly elegant, but it works. This particular problem doesn't exist when
you use UNC, but then you lose out of so much "portability" (though a bunch
of *these* problems can be got around using Deadline, either to set the
mapped paths prior to rendering OR by sending command lines to machines to
add and remove mapped drives).

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:57 PM, J Bills <jbillsn...@flickfx.com> wrote:

> I asked over on SSA and there's not really a definitive answer on mapped
> vs unc yet, when it comes to Nuking.  They all seem to be mostly over it,
> so it could have went extinct as a problem along the way or been specific
> to certain environment combinations.
>
> I still map as a "best practice" even though I find it annoying, because
> for a while there I got lax about it and started seeing delays and
> problems.  Nothing like waiting for the file dialog for 30s when you hit
> R.  Buzz kill!
>
> I remember having to write a script that reconnects to mapped volumes on a
> delay, because otherwise win7 would want to reconnect before the network
> was up and running and would trigger an error.
>
> I'll be doing some testing over the holidays here in the hopes of upping
> my Nuke and Windows version both to 10, and actually hoping that Freenas
> releases their v10 (what's up with v10 all around?) stable by then too so I
> can just up everything all in one go.  And subsequently have no idea what
> is causing problems when everything breaks!  ha ha.
>
> The new Freenas should have all the latest samba goodness, should all be
> an improvement all around.
>
> Although I will surely be diving for a "make windows 10 like 7 again"
> scripts.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Simon Tingell <si...@tingell.se> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew. A friend of mine wrote an article about how to deal with mixed
>> environments. It’s written for nuke 6 but it should probably point you in
>> the right direction.
>>
>> https://fredrikaverpil.github.io/2011/10/28/nuke-63-small-st
>> udio-setup-for-windows-osx/
>>
>> Kind regards.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> 1 dec. 2016 kl. 22:38 skrev Andrew Mumford <a_mumf...@mac.com>:
>>
>> I'm in a small mixed windows / mac shop are there any caveats to using
>> full //network paths vs mapped drive letters ?
>>
>> Thx
>>
>> ---
>> Andrew Mumford
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>



-- 
Dan Grover
3D Technical Director
www.dan-grover.com
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to