On Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:31:31 -0500 Robert Hetland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I set up a linux machine without BLAS, LAPACK, ATLAS, hoping that > lapack_lite would take over. For the moment, I am not concerned > about speed -- I just want something that will work with small > matricies. I installed numpy, and it passes all of the tests OK, but > it hangs when doing eig: > > u, v = linalg.eig(rand(10,10)) > # ....lots of nothing.... > > Do you *need* the linear algebra libraries for eig? BTW, inverse > seems to work fine. It should work. Can you give us a specific matrix where it fails? What platform are you running on? Lapack_lite probably doesn't get much testing from the developers, because we probably all have optimized versions of blas and lapack. -- |>|\/|< /--------------------------------------------------------------------------\ |David M. Cooke http://arbutus.physics.mcmaster.ca/dmc/ |[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
