Tim Hochberg wrote: >I was going to say that it may help to think of array_interface as >returning a *view*, since that seems to be the semantics that could >probably be implemented safely without too much trouble. However, it >looks like that's not what happens. array_interface->shape and strides >point to the raw shape and strides for the array. That looks like it's a >problem. Isn't: > > >>> ai = a.__array_interface__ > >>> a.shape = newshape > >going to result in ai having a stale pointers to shape and strides that >no longer exist? > This is an implementation detail. I'm still trying to gather some kind of consensus on what to actually do here. There is no such __array_interface__ attribute at this point.
-Travis _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
