On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:43:42AM +0200, Sven Schreiber wrote: > > Again, there is no defense for abbreviating linear_least_squares > > because it is unlikely to appear in an expression and waste valuable > > horisontal space. > > not true imho; btw, I would suggest "ols" (ordinary least squares), > which is in every textbook.
Please, keep the zen of python in mind : Explicit is better than implicit. -- Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France) Formations Python, Zope, Plone, Debian: http://www.logilab.fr/formations Développement logiciel sur mesure: http://www.logilab.fr/services Informatique scientifique: http://www.logilab.fr/science
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
