On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:26:41 +0100
"George Nurser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 07/07/06, Robert Hetland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> > However, I use transpose often when not dealing with linear algebra, in
> > particular with reading in data, and putting various columns into
> > variables.  Also, occasional in plotting (which expects things in
> > 'backward' order relative to x-y space), and communicating between
> > fortran programs (which typically use 'forward' order (x, y, z)) and
> > numpy (backward -- (z, x, y)).
> >
> This is my usage as well. Also my primitive knowledge of numpy
> requires use of the transpose when iterating over indexes from where.
> Moreover I think the notation .T is perfectly reasonable. So I agree
> with:

same.

> 
> > I am very much in favor of .T, but it should be a full .transpose(), not
> > just swap the last two axes.  I don't care so much for the others.
> 
> +1 for .T == .transpose()

Another +1 from me. If transpose was a shorter word I wouldn't care :-)

-- 
|>|\/|<
/--------------------------------------------------------------------------\
|David M. Cooke                      http://arbutus.physics.mcmaster.ca/dmc/
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to