I'm using nd_image extensively. Considering that SciPy seem to install much easier these days than I remember I would be just happy to put them in to SciPy.
Some numarray people prefer a transitional "special place". I remember that there was a discussion maybe a year ago of making SciPy so modular that (some?) sub-packages would be installable completely independent anyway - that would be the best :-) -Sebastian Haase On Tuesday 18 July 2006 12:09, Robert Kern wrote: > Travis Oliphant wrote: > > I'd like to get suggestions about what to do about the remaining > > numarray extension modules that are not addressed in NumPy (convolve, > > image, nd_image). There will be people coming from numarray that will > > be using these modules. > > > > Of course, my opinion is that they should not have been placed in > > Numarray to begin with as the fit better as modules in SciPy. > > > > But, given the situation. Should we bring them over to NumPy? Or, > > perhaps provide a small package that contain these modules separately? > > I'm definitely -1 on putting them in numpy. numpy is large enough as it is. > I'm -0 on making a standalone package. The time would be better spent on > making sure that scipy subpackages can be downloaded, built and installed > individually. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
