Rolf Wester wrote: > David Grant wrote: > >> A factor of 2! Is that short for a factor of **2? >> >> > That means Numeric/weave takes about 17 s (on my PC), and the > numby/weave version takes about 32 s. >
Please show your code. There are several factors that have changed here. For example, Python 2.4 is different that Python 2.3. There are only a few usages when Numeric is faster than NumPy and in most of these using regular Python lists is faster than Numeric and NumPy anyway. Nonetheless, there are still improvements that can be made to NumPy. Which version of NumPy are you using? -Travis ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
