A. M. Archibald wrote: >On 05/10/06, Greg Willden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>On 10/5/06, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>Perhaps that is the best way to move forward along with the work on a >>>"pylab" super-package. >>> >>> >>That is exactly what I want. >> >> > >What is unsatisfactory about installing numpy+scipy+matplotlib? I've >found they're generally pretty complete (except where no decent python >alternative exists). > > > >>In the end I want a nice collection of functions, logically organized, that >>let me analyze/filter/plot etc. etc. etc. >> >>The key for me is "logically organized". >> >> > > > There is a structure to it, but it's more organic because of the multiple contributors.
weave should be in NumPy but nobody was willing to step up to maintain it a year ago. I may be willing to step up at this point. I would like to see weave in NumPy (maybe not the blitz libraries though...) I think a hybrid for weave / f2py / ctypes that allows "inlining in multiple languages" as well as automatic extension module generation for "already-written" code is in order. -Travis ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
