On 10/17/06, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 16 October 2006 22:08, Michael Sorich wrote: > > Does this new MA class allow masking of rearray like arrays? > > Excellent question! Which is to say, I have no idea... I don't use > recordarray, so I didn't think about testing them. > > So, a first test indicates that it doesn't work either. The mask for a3 is > understood as having a size 6, when the data is seen as size 2 only (exactly > the same problem as the original ma module). > I gonna poke around and check whether I can come with a workaround. Just to > make it clear: you want to be able to mask some fields in some records, > right ? Not mask all the fields of a record ?
Yes, that is correct. It would be preferable to have more control over masking than simply masking an entire record. I view the heterogenouse arrays as 2D arrays in which it should be possible to mask individual values. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion