Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On 10/17/06, *Charles R Harris* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/17/06, *A. M. Archibald* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> On 17/10/06, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10/17/06, Travis Oliphant < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>
> <snip>
>
> Which doesn't seem to be the case here. I am beginning to wonder
> if we really need fortran order, seems that a few well chosen
> interface routines would fill the need and avoid much confusion.
>
>
> For instance, it would be nice if flatten took an order keyword:
>
> In [107]: array([[1,2,3],[4,5,6]], dtype=int8, order='F').flatten()
> Out[107]: array([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], dtype=int8)
It does take an argument (just not a keyword argument). The general
rule I followed (probably inappropriately) was that single-argument
methods didn't need keywords.
so
a.flatten('F') gives you a Fortran-order flattening.
-Travis
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
