On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Jun 24, 2017 7:29 AM, "Sylvain Corlay" <sylvain.cor...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Also, one quick question: is the LGPL license a deliberate choice or is it > not important to you? Most projects in the Python scientific stack are BSD > licensed. So the LGPL choice makes it unlikely that a higher-level project > adopts it as a dependency. If you are the only copyright holder, you would > still have the possibility to license it under a more permissive license > such as BSD or MIT... > > > Why would LGPL be a problem in a dependency? That doesn't stop you making > your code BSD, and it's less restrictive license-wise than depending on MKL > or the windows C runtime... > Is scipy still including any LGPL code, I thought not. There might still be some optional dependencies that not many users are using by default. ? Julia packages are mostly MIT, AFAIK. (except for the GPL parts because of cholmod, which we (?) avoid) Josef > > -n > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
