On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Makes sense to me. > > On Sep 25, 2017 05:54, "Matthew Brett" <matthew.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I suggest we switch from ATLAS to OpenBLAS for our Windows wheels: >> >> * OpenBLAS is much faster, at least when Tony Kelman tested it last year >> [1]; >> * We now have an automated Appveyor build for OpenBLAS [2, 3]; >> * Tests are passing with 32-bit and 64-bit wheels [4]; >> * The next Scipy release will have OpenBLAS wheels; >> >> Any objections / questions / alternatives? >> > +1 Ralf >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> >> [1] https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/5479#issuecomment-185033668 >> [2] https://github.com/matthew-brett/build-openblas >> [3] https://ci.appveyor.com/project/matthew-brett/build-openblas >> [4] https://ci.appveyor.com/project/matthew-brett/numpy-wheels/ >> build/1.0.50 >> _______________________________________________ >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >> NumPy-Discussion@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >> > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion