Thank you so much, the solution was much simpler than I expected! On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 23:04:43 +0200, Daπid <davidmen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 October 2017 at 22:32, Eric Wieser <wieser.eric+nu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > David, that doesn’t work, because np.cumsum(mask)[mask] is always equal > > to np.arange(mask.sum()) + 1. Robert’s answer is correct. > > > Of course, you are right. It makes sense in my head now. > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
