On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:11 PM Robert T. McGibbon <rmcgi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm strongly in support of this proposal. Type annotations have really > helped me write more correct code. > > I started working on numpy type stubs a few months ago. I needed a mypy > plugin to support shape-aware functions. Those whole thing is pretty > tricky. Still very WIP, but I'll clean them up a little bit and opensource > it shortly. > Great to hear -- I'd love to see what this looks like, or hear any lessons you learned from the experience! Actual experience using and writing such a type checker gives you a valuable perspective to share, as opposed to my speculation. Cheers, Stephan
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
