I'm happy to chat about how pandas has done things. It's worth noting that although it may *look* like Jeff Reback is a full-time maintainer (he does a lot of work!), he has actually been maintaining pandas as a side-project. Mostly the project bumbles along without a clear direction, somewhat similar to the case for NumPy for the past few years, with new contributions coming from either interested users or core developers when they have time and interest.
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 10:00 AM Nelle Varoquaux <nelle.varoqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Furher resources to consider: >> - How did Jupyter organize their roadmap (ask Brian Granger)? >> - How did Pandas run the project with a full time maintainer (Jeff >> Reback)? >> - Can we copy other projects' management guidelines? >> > > scikit-learn also has a number of full time developers. Might be worth > checking out what they did. > > Cheers, > N > > >> >> We did not set a time for another online discussion, since it was felt >> that maybe near/during the sprint in May would be appropriate. >> >> I apologize for any misrepresentation. >> >> Matti Picus >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >> NumPy-Discussion@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >> > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
