Reviving this discussion -- I don't really care what our policy is, but can we make a decision one way or the other about where we discuss NEPs? We've had a revival of NEP writing recently, so this is very timely.
Previously, I was in slight favor of doing discussion on GitHub. Now that I've started doing a bit of NEP writing, I've started to swing the other way, since it would be nice to be able to reference draft/rejected NEPs in a consistent way -- and rendered HTML is more readable than raw RST in pull requests. On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 6:52 PM Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Apparently, where and how to discuss enhancement proposals was > recently a topic on the python mailing list as well -- see the > write-up at LWN: > https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/749200/4343911ee71e35cf/ > The conclusion seems to be that one should switch to mailman3... > -- Marten > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
