PEP-574 isn't on the roadmap (yet!), but I think we would clearly welcome it. Like all NumPy improvements, it would need to implemented by an interested party. On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 1:52 AM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote:
> > Hi, > > Do you plan to consider trying to add PEP 574 / pickle5 support? There's > an implementation ready (and a PyPI backport) that you can play with. > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0574/ > > PEP 574 implicits targets Numpy arrays as one of its primary producers, > since Numpy arrays is how large scientific or numerical data often ends > up represented and where zero-copy is often desired by users. > > PEP 574 could certainly be useful even without Numpy arrays supporting > it, but less so. So I would welcome any feedback on that front (and, > given that I'd like PEP 574 to be accepted in time for Python 3.8, I'd > ideally like to have that feedback sometimes in the forthcoming months > ;-)). > > Best regards > > Antoine. > > > On Thu, 31 May 2018 16:50:02 -0700 > Matti Picus <matti.pi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > At the recent NumPy sprint at BIDS (thanks to those who made the trip) > > we spent some time brainstorming about a roadmap for NumPy, in the > > spirit of similar work that was done for Jupyter. The idea is that a > > document with wide community acceptance can guide the work of the > > full-time developer(s), and be a source of ideas for expanding > > development efforts. > > > > I put the document up at > > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/NumPy-Roadmap, and hope to discuss > > it at a BOF session during SciPy in the middle of July in Austin. > > > > Eventually it could become a NEP or formalized in another way. > > > > Matti > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
