On Sun, Jun 17, 2018, 7:48 PM Marten van Kerkwijk <m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Travis, > > More of a detailed question, but as we are currently thinking about > extending the signature of gufuncs (i.e., things like `(m,n),(n,p)->(m,p)` > for matrix multiplication), and as you must have thought about this for > libgufunc, could you point me to how one would document the signature in > your new system? (I briefly tried but there's no docs yet and I couldn't > immediately find it in the code). If it is at all similar to numpy's and > you have extended it, we should at least check whether we can do the same > thing. > I have been reading with interest these gufunc proposals and have pointed it out to the gumath devs. Right now, gumath doesn't go much beyond NumPy's syntax except for use of a more extensible type system. It uses the same notion of the dimension signature, though with a syntax derived from datashape which you can read more about here: http://datashape.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ Stefan Krah, Pearu, or Saul may have more comments. Thanks, -Travis > Thanks, all best wishes, > > Marten > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
