Note that this is the first formal proposal to accept a NEP using our new process (yay!). While writing it I realized that the current text about this in NEP 0 is a bit terse, so I've also just submitted a PR to expand that section:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/11459 -n On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I propose that we accept NEP 15: Merging multiarray and umath: > > http://www.numpy.org/neps/nep-0015-merge-multiarray-umath.html > > The core part of this proposal was uncontroversial. The main point of > discussion was whether it was OK to deprecate set_numeric_ops, or > whether it had some legitimate use cases. The conclusion was that in > all the cases where set_numeric_ops is useful, > PyUFunc_ReplaceLoopBySignature is a strictly better alternative, so > there's no reason not to deprecate set_numeric_ops. So at this point I > think the whole proposal is uncontroversial, and we can go ahead and > accept it. > > If there are no substantive objections within 7 days from this email, > then the NEP will be accepted; see NEP 0 for more details: > http://www.numpy.org/neps/nep-0000.html > > -n > > -- > Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
